Small business investment barriers identified

code, financial planning, industrial relations, funding guide, commitments, proposal, Ombudsman, ASBFEO Kate Carnell, amnesty, superannuation, cabinet, small business payments funds, eligibility, asset, write off, workplace relations, APRA, fair dismissal code

The Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman (ASBFEO) has released a study into factors impacting SME investment.

Speaking at the Institute of Public Accountants national conference on the Gold Coast, Ombudsman Kate Carnell said barriers to investment included access to capital, red tape and energy prices.

Carnell said removing barriers to small business investment would give the sector confidence to grow and boost jobs.

Despite recent claims by bank executives that lending to small firms is booming, the Ombudsman said this wasn’t the case for borrowers who don’t have equity in property.

“Traditional bank loans are backed by real property mortgages and although alternatives are emerging, they are not currently mature and affordable,” Carnell said. “Young aspiring small business operators are particularly disadvantaged and increasingly rely on their parents to provide seed finance.”

Carnell said this meant the “Bank of Mum and Dad” was often called on to help young entrepreneurs.

“This offers convenience and flexibility, but it puts people’s retirement savings at risk. It also raises social equity issues in that the children of affluent parents have greater opportunities to buy and grow businesses.”

Carnell said a government-backed guarantee scheme could be the answer, similar to the British Business Bank.

The Ombudsman’s study also takes aim at red tape, saying past reduction efforts have largely been “window dressing”, and that a successful pilot in Parramatta to make compliance requirements seamless should be extended to other areas.

“It was found there were more than 50 pieces of regulation which applied to setting up a hospitality business in Parramatta and the regulation meant it took up to 18 months to commence trading.

“Regulation wasn’t removed, but was instead sped up and made invisible. Information provided once was used to automatically complete forms in other areas of bureaucracy.

“This is a smart way of using systems and technology to relieve regulatory burdens on business,” Carnell concluded.